<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>
    	<title>TickerHound.com</title>

		<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/feed/user/ChaosNantuko/asked/feed.rss</link>
		<description>TickerHound.com Question Feed - user: ChaosNantuko's asked questions</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>contact@tickerhound.com</dc:creator>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.tickerhound.com/" />

		
        <item>
			<title>What mechanism is used by countries to control the value of their currency?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009061dffee1/what-mechanism-is-used-by-countries-to-control-the-value-of-their-currency</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009061dffee1/what-mechanism-is-used-by-countries-to-control-the-value-of-their-currency</guid>
			<description>In an article about treasuries recently, i read
&quot;China increased its holdings by 3.2 percent, the most since November, buying Treasuries with its reserves to control the level of the yuan. The currency, which was pegged at about 8 to the dollar until July 2005, has traded between 6.8 and 6.9 since last June. It closed May 29 at 6.8291 to the dollar.

&#39;To some extent they have to buy Treasuries because they want to support their currency peg,&#39; said Carl Lantz, an interest&#45;rate strategist in New York at Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC. The firm is also a primary dealer. &quot;

How exactly does this work? </description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:32:17 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Time to buy some RIMM</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090516c66a3e/time-to-buy-some-rimm</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090516c66a3e/time-to-buy-some-rimm</guid>
			<description>I was just looking at RIMM again, and i was surprised to learn that comparing Q1 2009 to Q1 2008, they increased revenue from 1882.7 million to 3463.2 million, an 84% increase.  Yet with a PE ratio of only 23, they&#39;re priced as if their growth stage is near an end.  Its seems to me like their situation in terms of profits and revenue are significantly better then before the recession, yet they&#39;re trading at half the price.
What do you make of that; Is RIMM severely undervalued, or is there a factor I&#39;m missing here?  For a long term buy, what are your thoughts on Research in motion? </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:35:43 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>If gm/chrysler go down, it means more business for the other major players.  Whose best set to benefit?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009031f2660d1/if-gm-chrysler-go-down-it-means-more-business-for-the-other-major-players-whose-best-set-to-benefit</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009031f2660d1/if-gm-chrysler-go-down-it-means-more-business-for-the-other-major-players-whose-best-set-to-benefit</guid>
			<description>Which companies will benefit most from GM and Chrysler being out of the picture when the recession is over? </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:44:47 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Where can i find detailed BP charts for various industries?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200904189cbf20/where-can-i-find-detailed-bp-charts-for-various-industries</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200904189cbf20/where-can-i-find-detailed-bp-charts-for-various-industries</guid>
			<description>I know stock charts has bullish percent indexes for some for the main 9 sectors, but i was looking for something more specific... </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:40:03 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Do you add to profitable positions if you think theres more money to be made?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090314776394/do-you-add-to-profitable-positions-if-you-think-theres-more-money-to-be-made</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090314776394/do-you-add-to-profitable-positions-if-you-think-theres-more-money-to-be-made</guid>
			<description>Talking both short side and long side.
if your long 100 shares of a $100 company, with a stop loss at 90, and it goes to $130, then do you buy more stock to maintain the overall risk level when you move up your stop loss, or do you take profits?  This is assuming you believe it has much higher to go. </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:41:56 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Does anyone have experience with Monte Carlo portfolio simulators?  Know of any good free ones?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090314eae91b/does-anyone-have-experience-with-monte-carlo-portfolio-simulators-know-of-any-good-free-ones</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090314eae91b/does-anyone-have-experience-with-monte-carlo-portfolio-simulators-know-of-any-good-free-ones</guid>
			<description>I&#39;m trying to expand my knowledge of portfolio allocation, and after reading a couple good articles regarding projected portfolio return vs. standard deviation, I think i should look more deeply into this, and experiment a bit with potential portfolios.  Does anyone have experience with Monto Carlo portfolio simulators, and suggestions for any free ones? </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:00:30 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Do you think the SPX will be higher, or lower then it is now by Jan 2012?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009021b6748b1/do-you-think-the-spx-will-be-higher-or-lower-then-it-is-now-by-jan-2012</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009021b6748b1/do-you-think-the-spx-will-be-higher-or-lower-then-it-is-now-by-jan-2012</guid>
			<description> </description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:46:48 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Will the mortgage resets coming up in 2010&#45;2012 be as destructive as this one?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090112727cbc/will-the-mortgage-resets-coming-up-in-2010-2012-be-as-destructive-as-this-one</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/20090112727cbc/will-the-mortgage-resets-coming-up-in-2010-2012-be-as-destructive-as-this-one</guid>
			<description>The next wave is nearly as large as this one, but the big difference seems to be that the wave coming 2010&#45;2012 has very little subprime mortgages resetting, and a much larger percentage of option adjustable rate and Alt&#45;A mortgages resetting.  What is the difference between subprime, opion adjustable rate, and Alt&#45;A mortgages, and do you think the second wave will be as destructive as the one we&#39;re currently experiancing? 
Here is where i found a chart of the mortgage resets:
&lt;a target=&quot;_NEW&quot; href=&quot;http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp&#45;content/uploads/2007/10/monthly&#45;mortgage&#45;resets.jpg&quot; &gt;http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/wp&#45;content/uploads/2007/10/monthly&#45;mortga ge&#45;resets.jpg&lt;/a&gt; </description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:32:47 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Why is the ratio of stocks making 52 week highs&#45;lows so different then that for mutual funds?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009015febe80/why-is-the-ratio-of-stocks-making-52-week-highs-lows-so-different-then-that-for-mutual-funds</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009015febe80/why-is-the-ratio-of-stocks-making-52-week-highs-lows-so-different-then-that-for-mutual-funds</guid>
			<description>I just took a glance at stock charts, specifically this page right here...
&lt;a target=&quot;_NEW&quot; href=&quot;http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.scan&quot; &gt;http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.scan&lt;/a&gt;
According to this page, there are 34 stocks making new 52 week highs on the Nasdaq, NYSE, AMEX, and TSE, and only 25 making new 52 week lows, for a 34 to 25 ratio (that almost sounds bullish).
Yet only 4 mutual funds are making 52 week highs, and 101 are making 52 week lows.
What is the significance of this information? </description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:39:32 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>MYGN a buy on a pullback?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009016791d60/mygn-a-buy-on-a-pullback</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2009016791d60/mygn-a-buy-on-a-pullback</guid>
			<description> </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>When examining insider buys and sells, is the dollar figure the most important?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2008121ee53de3/when-examining-insider-buys-and-sells-is-the-dollar-figure-the-most-important</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2008121ee53de3/when-examining-insider-buys-and-sells-is-the-dollar-figure-the-most-important</guid>
			<description>Or would factors such as percentage of the insiders total wealth, increase (decrease) in total percentage ownership,  or some other metric be more useful? </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:58:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>How do you think the recent IEA report will influence oil prices and the overall markets?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200811c06f5e9/how-do-you-think-the-recent-iea-report-will-influence-oil-prices-and-the-overall-markets</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200811c06f5e9/how-do-you-think-the-recent-iea-report-will-influence-oil-prices-and-the-overall-markets</guid>
			<description>&lt;a target=&quot;_NEW&quot; href=&quot;http://www.iea.org/&quot; &gt;http://www.iea.org/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:13:13 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>What are your thoughts on Agrium?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200807e2492a1/what-are-your-thoughts-on-agrium</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200807e2492a1/what-are-your-thoughts-on-agrium</guid>
			<description>I&#39;m looking more towards the short term, but a long term viewpoint would be useful as well. </description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:20:40 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Google announces earnings thursday... Think it will come in good or bad?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200807d5c7bb0/google-announces-earnings-thursday-think-it-will-come-in-good-or-bad</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200807d5c7bb0/google-announces-earnings-thursday-think-it-will-come-in-good-or-bad</guid>
			<description>On thursday, Google announces earnings.  I&#39;m thinking heavy volatility is just about guaranteed here.  So which way will it swing?  Think they&#39;ll beat earnings, miss earnings, or come close to earnings? </description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:57:09 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
		
        <item>
			<title>Calling a bottom premature?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2008078709b4b/calling-a-bottom-premature</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/2008078709b4b/calling-a-bottom-premature</guid>
			<description>Examining previous bear markets, i&#39;ve been examing how far they fell. 
the 2000&#45;2003 bear market had the S&amp;P index went from 1527 to 800, a drop of 48%.
In the early 80s, the S&amp;P index went from 140 to 103, a drop of 26%.
From 73 to 75, it went from 120 to 62, a drop of 48%.
from 69 to 71, it went from 108 to 72, a drop of 33%.
The drop in the beginning of the new millenium was due to the dot com bubble, and that affected a narrow segment of the market compared to the current issues.  The drops in the 70s were due to high oil prices, which we&#39;re also currently experiencing.
Given the severity of previous drops and their causes, what % drop do you think will occur here, and how valid would you say this form of analysis is?
for charts of the S&amp;P index back to 1960, see: &lt;a target=&quot;_NEW&quot; href=&quot;http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/spx1960.html&quot; &gt;http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/spx1960.html&lt;/a&gt;
for charts of the dow index back to 1900, see:
&lt;a target=&quot;_NEW&quot; href=&quot;http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/djia1900.html&quot; &gt;http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/djia1900.html&lt;/a&gt; </description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:38:48 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
			</channel>
</rss>
