<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>
    	<title>TickerHound.com</title>

		<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/feed/user/Shor/asked/feed.rss</link>
		<description>TickerHound.com Question Feed - user: Shor's asked questions</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<dc:creator>contact@tickerhound.com</dc:creator>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.tickerhound.com/" />

		
        <item>
			<title>What do y&#39;all think of non&#45;correlated funds (ie Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund)?</title>
			<link>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200803ac585a4/what-do-y-all-think-of-non-correlated-funds-ie-campbell-strategic-allocation-fund</link>
			<guid>http://www.tickerhound.com/questions/detail/200803ac585a4/what-do-y-all-think-of-non-correlated-funds-ie-campbell-strategic-allocation-fund</guid>
			<description>Many analysts are bullish on the commodity sector.  I asked my broker his opinion inre The Rogers Int&#39;l Commodity Index&#45;&#45;Total Return ETN (RJI).  He responded that RJI is tied directly into commodity prices going up and suggested that I look at the Campbell Strategic Allocation Fund which plays commodities both long and short and that they have a very good record of making money for investors.  My hesitation is that they charge very high management fees and cannot be tracked on a daily basis.  Anybody have any thoughts on this?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:30:10 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
			</channel>
</rss>
